THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND: THE END OF ANGLICANISM AND THE ROAD TO DISSAFECTIONISM CAUSED BY THE APPOINTMENT OF WOMEN BISHOPS

Once again, we read in the news of the 'destruction from within' as The Church Of England falls in line with Jesus' own words that a "House divided against itself cannot stand" .

This internal form of destruction, which is currently plaguing The Church of England, is something that Jesus himself was debating with his disciples when he revealed to them the results of national, social and religious decline in Israel and the ultimate destruction of the temple. It is interesting to note how prevalent the words of Jesus are in relation to Christian values within the Church today because of the pressures of modernism and secularisation.

The Church of England is faced with a new crisis as the havoc created by the drive for Secularism brings the fellowship of believers into disrepute yet again, caused more recently by the 'New Age' thinkers in support of the ordination of gay Bishops and of Women Priests.

Is this recent legislation proving to be the end of Anglicanism and the start of the road towards dissafectionism within the Church of England, and can this devolution really be caused by the ill-reputed appointment to authority of the 'Ordination of Women' to the ministry?

The Church of England appears to be facing another major battle as recent legislation to consecrate women bishops is set to pass a key hurdle.

It has been widely reported that members of the Church's national assembly, the General Synod, are gathering at York University for a five-day meeting dominated by the issue with a marathon 15 hours of debate scheduled on the topic

As part of this gathering's main business, the assembly will also consider draft legislation creating women bishops without the relevant safeguards demanded by objectors, such as setting out new dioceses, or creating a special class of bishop to cater for dissenters.

Instead, women bishops would be granted their own authority to make local arrangements for objectors if necessary, after referring to a special statutory code of practice.

This legislation is likely to come under fierce attack from many conservative evangelicals and Anglo Catholics, some of whom are threatening to leave the Church of England if their demands are not met.

Furthermore, this debate and its subsequent legislation suggests that 'Divorced clergy' could also be allowed to become Church of England bishops for the first time.

It is a fact that Church leaders have been discussing the move for some time and are expected to reveal their decision in July during the General Synod, which is the 'national assembly' of the Church of England.

This convention would mean these changes could face heavy criticism from traditionalists who believe it would undermine the core tradition of biblical teaching.

According to representatives of the House of Bishops, it is expected that the statement, addressing the relevant legal and theological issues, will be available in July when the General Synod meets.

A spokesman for the House says that: there is no legal restraint for persons who have remarried after divorce, or are married to spouses remarried after divorce, in becoming bishops. What is required here is a clarification, particularly in an area where there has previously been some uncertainty, both about the legal background, and the specific policy of The Church of England, to be allowed to embrace this process.


The Church of England is continually facing fresh turmoil within its ranks as it published proposals paving the way for the consecration of women bishops.
Women bishops would be created without specific policies for relevant safeguards demanded by the Church of England's opponents under plans drawn up by a group working on the legislation.

The scheme, to be debated at the Church's national assembly, rejects measures such as the setting up of new dioceses or the installation of a special class of bishops to cater for objectors.

Instead, women bishops who might be appointed in the future, would retain the authority to make their own local arrangements for objectors if necessary, after referring to a common statutory code of practice.


Have Your say...!
What do you think about this recent introduction surrounding the Ordination of Women Bishops?

Do you believe that the Ordination of Women in the Church is against New Testament Teaching and if so?

What evidence is there for holding this view?

What are your opinions regarding the debate over Gay Bishops?

Do you think the Church of England should be more or Less tolerant of others in Church ministry?

Can someone who is divorced continue as a minister?


Have your say on these important topics affecting churches today!
Simply click on the word 'Comments' at the bottom of each post below then Click the white dialogue box and enter your details and comments in the white space that appears. Thank you for taking part.
Att-AllTheseThings.Blogspot.com

Acknowlegement: This article contains elements previously reported on by other works on this subject.

TRUE LOVE: The reward of those who embrace it

Probably one of the greatest statements ever made in the Bible, is the one that sums up the whole purpose of God and that is the word's of the Gospel of John which says:





"...For God so loved the World that he gave His Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish, but shall have everlasting life" (John 3:16).


Many people, born into this world, tend to go through life with various notions as to what life is and what their version means for them. How, we as humans' take advantage of our existence, also affects, not only how we live and die, but also how others that we influence, live and die too.

We take 'life' for granted, in the same way as we take each other for granted.

The most common human concept that we have developed is the one that says: "I'm alright Jack so you must be too". This has been transliterated egocentrically to mean "If I'm OK, Your OK".

The reality though, is often far different from what we come to believe, or imagine.

Often, we will find that people do not always fit into this thought mould, and the reasons for this may be as many as the multitude of stars in the night sky. People are, as the Bible puts it: "...sat in darkness..." People are overcome with many issues of life such as loneliness, rejection, humilitation, degradation, upheaval, war, depravity, starvation, sickness and even death. These are just a few of the conditions of 'life' that we face not to mention also bullying, harrassment, poverty, homelessness, grief, anguish, deep anxiety, mental illness, disease, disability and loss.

The whole world is suffering, but not everyone experiences all these things, and some people only seem to experience a little of these things in their lifetime. Some people are more comfortable with the life they lead, than others. The strong do not always support the weak. I am not always my brothers keeper. The hardships of life are cruel and harsh and debilitating, even crippling.

Somehow, in the midst of all these things, we manage to maintain our sense of dignity. Somehow, we manage to perpetuate our humanity and to pass on our sense of hope. Hope, that one day, life will not always be like this. That somehow, life will get better for us. Thus we grow up with a sense of inadequacy that despite all our efforts to the contrary, we still somehow cannot get things quite right for ourselves, and for each other.

Even more so, we feel isolation as a person, as a nation and even as a planet. We come to believe that we are all alone in this myriad of stars and if there is even the remotest chance that there is a God, working somewhere in the universe, that we have somehow become distant and separated.

This is just the place that the Bible describes as the true condition of mankind. The bible says that our sins have separated us from God. Our relationships with one another are fraught with inadequacies, yet we continue to believe we are 'ok'.

Even if we believe in God or not, it is a common fact that because of the way we go through life, our perceptions of God are distorted and often completely inadequate too. We feel that love is inadequate, that we are undeserving and that if God exists, then he cannot truly love us either, otherwise we would not be suffering the way we do. We blame each other for the state of our world and we even blame God too.

Nevertheless, the Bible says that there is a God "...One who inclines his ear toward us " (Psalms 4, 5, 10:17, 13:3, 17:6-15, 20:1, 38:15, 55:1-2, and Psalm 116 ), and that there is a God that loves us: "For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him, shall not perish, but shall have everlasting life.


Jesus said: "...I am not come into this world to destroy it, but that the world, through me, might have everlasting life". Jesus also said: "I am come that you might have life and have it more abundantly".


The Bible declares that there is a way that seems right to man, but the ways of man are the ways of death. However, if you believe on the Lord Jesus Christ you shall be saved(Acts 16 : 31). Jesus also says: "Verily, verily I say unto you that whosever believes in me hath everlasting life" (John 6:47).


The Bible also says that: "... he that believeth not the Son, shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him" (John 3:36). The scriptures reveal that mankind has been born in a state of sin since the time of Adam and that God has, since that time, sought to make amends for mankind to be saved fromthe ultimate consequences of sin.


Sin not only does harm personally and individually, but also does harm collectively and involves the whole ecology of life on earth and in our atmosphere. Ultimately, sin affects the whole equilibrium of the universe that God has created. God knows this and cannot abide the presence of sin, for He is also Holy. Yet, despite the fact that man's sins have separated us from almighty God, He still Loves us as the scripture shows, and he has made a way for us to be reconciled to Himself and that way is through God's only begotten Son: The Lord Jesus Christ.


God demands blood sacrifice as the means of Atonement for sin but God hates the idea that mankind commits sacrifices on a daily basis which have no solid foundation of righteousness attached to it. This type of sacrifice is no more than meaningless ritualism and does not work. Men still sin. It is only the pure and righteous sacrifice of God's Son as the perfect Lamb of God, that makes the perfect, one time only sacrifice, that satisfies the demand of God as the price of Sin. No other sacrifice will do.


Jesus came that we might have Life and in Him is the light of men and if we turn to Him and pray to Him and seek his face, His Righteousness, then he will do what he says: He will forgive us our sins and cleanse us from All unrighteousness and He will accept us as His Children. he will save us. Therefore do as the scriptures command: Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved.

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRUE CHURCH

WHAT IS THE CHURCH?

Jesus said:'I will build my Church and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it'.

According to T. C. Hammond: "'The Church' is a Universal Society' of the faithful, whom God has predestinated from Eternity, to Everlasting Life".
It is generally considered however, that much harm has been done to the church by those who dogmatically assert that their definition of 'church,' is 'the only true way'.
Hammond asserts that by some strange irony, those who set themselves up in this way end up by securing to themselves an even greater 'mixed multitude'... under other names, which in turn become liberally and Sacerdotably defined by numerous other perversions of The Apostolic Tradition, of what a 'Church' is.


So what then is 'The Church'?
To clarify Hammond's perception of the 'The church' of The New Testament, we must first understand what 'The Church' is not.
The Church is not an organization in which certain 'orders of succession,' are handed down in lineage form, often conferred on others by bishops or pastors, on members to whom they are related. Neither is it controlled by a limited few, who dominate its authority, in terms of supremacy of leadership and order.

As an organization, a church that is so constructed, does not have the leadership of The Holy ghost at its helm, but is rather, superseded by the deliberations and intents of 'rulership', more than that of 'stewardship' despite its dogmatic, or charismatic appearance. The Church is not a hierarchical order, as supposed by some, in which church governance is limited to just a few well placed persons simply because of advantage, who assign themselves to mediatorial work as 'priests' with varying levels of office, as these offices are the God given right of all believers in Christ Jesus. It is not the sole right of any ‘Clerical Caste’, be it ‘Bishop’, or ‘Pastor’.

Ministers are not to be differentiated from the rest of the body of Christ, as all believers have this right conferred upon them through the laying on of hands by the Holy Ghost. The Bible declares: "Now are we are all Kings and Priests unto God..."

The Church is not an unguided democracy. Instead it is as scripture tells it, 'that as many as are led by the Spirit of God 'They' are the sons of God'.

The Church is not of itself a meeting place of worship as defined by the construction of bricks and mortar. Neither is The Church a denotation of the inhabitants of any country and therefore cannot be used to claim a substitute for nationality, as defined by others historically, such as is commonly used to describe Britain for example.


How then can we understand the true definition of 'The Church'?

What is the True Church?

The Church: A People of Worship

The Old Testament definition of The Church was originally understood as,
'The Lord's House'.
Initially this 'House' was constructed as a mobile Temple, or Tabernacle, originally used by the Isrealites after their escape from Egypt. This Tabernacle was in a sense, 'The Heart' of the people, as it was placed at the centre of all the Isrealites said and did. Every morning they would look up and see the Tabernacle in the centre of the camp and whenever the Isrealites moved, the Tabernacle moved with them. Here then, is one of the earliest principles of God concerning the benefits of the meaning and purpose of The Temple being at the centre, or heart of the people.

Later, under king David and his son Solomon, the Temple became a fixed structure, this was a symbolic ideal that suggests the Temple should now be viewed not only as the heart of the people but also as an immovable and permanent force, a visible establishment of the invisible purposes of God for a people whose eyes were always upon The Lord, for direction. It was the place of communication where the people assembled themselves to hear the word of the Lord and Worship God (Acts 19:32, 39, 41).

In the New Testament, 'The House of The Lord' is translated into 'The Ecclesia' meaning 'the ones’ who assemble' or 'The Gathered Ones', (those who assemble themselves together, or those who gather themselves together to Worship), in Jesus Christ. Ecclesia, also refers to the body of Jesus Christ, as the body of the redeemed: 'The Called Out Ones', or 'The Separated Ones'. These terms signify the whole body of the redeemed of The Lord Jesus Christ comprising all those that the Father has given to Him (John 17).

There are numerous scriptural references to the concept of 'The Church' in the New Testament.

Some believers gathered in houses and others out in the open air, whilst others gathered in larger congregations in places such as in Antioch, or Corinth, or Rome. These groups became know as the Church at Corinth, the Church at Antioch etc., this is very different concept from todays 'organised churches', which tend to be the Church 'of' some place, or group or other.

The True Church then, is made up of people who are redeemed, and saved, and obedient, to the voice and commandments of God.



Moreover, The Church can be summarised in this way.
It is not a Human Organisation but the precise workmanship of God (Ephesians 2:12, 1 Peter 2:10) and in this context, The Church is seen as 'the people' of God, which includes Israel, having obtained mercy by the Grace of God.

It is the Household, or Family of God (Ephesians 2:19, 3:15, 4:6), and consist of those who are adopted by The Lord as Sons and Heirs together with Jesus Christ.

The Church is the planting of the Lord to bring forth fruit to His Glory (1Corinthians 3:10 and John 15:1).

The Church is a Holy temple built by God himself through Jesus Christ and is made unto Him a Dwelling Place founded on Holiness and Worship. (Ephesians 2:21, John 2:19, 1 Corinthians 3:9, 1 Peter 2:4).

The Church is 'The bride Of Christ' cleansed and sanctified awaiting the eternal marriage of the Lord (Ephesians 5:25).

The Church is the whole Body of Christ and the fullness of him who fills all in all.
As believers, the trust of 'The Church' for its master, comes from the heart, and is demonstrated by the obedience and actions of the Lord's people as a result of the special sanctified work of the Holy Ghost in those who are redeemed.

God's Church consists of a ‘Spiritually Transformed People’, who are not conformed to this world, e.g. not affected by secularist views of the Christian faith, but who are transformed by the renewing of the mind, proving what is both, good and acceptable and perfect to the Will of God. (Romans 12:2). This transformation is a work of the Holy Ghost in conjunction with believers seeking to humble themselves to walk in the light of God. St Paul says: ‘Brethren, be not deceived, but rather test the spirits to see if they be of God’.

WHAT IS A CHRISTIAN?

One of the hottest debates doing its rounds on the Internet, Radio and Television of late is that of defining what a Christian is. It seems that there are enormous problems arising from this debate and this appears to be caused by specific denominational and non-denominational interpretations and interests that centre around whether or not how strongly Religions, Churches and ‘Christians’ believe their interpretations to be ‘the correct one’.

No other term used in the Bible has ever caused so much controversy as the term ‘Christian’, apart from the numerous philosophical debates surrounding the ideas of ‘Creation and how Life came into existence’ and the age old question of whether or not, ‘God can actually raise the dead to Life again’, as was also discussed by St Paul in his interview with King Agrippa (Acts 26:8)
Verse 8. Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?

Ambiguity In Scripture?
Or simply an inability to accept what is written therein?

Some say the Bible is ambiguous about the definition of the meaning ‘Christian’ and in fact some Authorities on the Bible suppose the name ‘Christian’ to be coined by the Greeks or the Romans, but this view is often interpreted probably as a means of reproach, to the increasing number of followers of Jesus.
According to The Bible however, the name ‘Christian’ was used at the first real church gathering in Antioch.

Some authorities on the Bible suggest that the names by which the Disciples, or early followers of Jesus were known among themselves were, "brethren," "the faithful," "the elect," "the saints," "the believers." But, to distinguish the followers of Jesus from the myriad of other religious groups that also existed around that time, the name "Christian" came into common use, and after a while, was universally accepted, especially from the time of Constantine, and throughout the Roman world.

• Interestingly enough, the name ‘Christian’ occurs but three times in the New Testament and this can be found in the book of ‘The Acts of The Apostles’ (Acts 11:26), which suggests that the name ‘Christian was coined by believers at the first major church convention held at Antioch.

• The Church at Antioch had become a fast growing church and appeared to be moving under the power of the Holy Ghost to such an extent that ‘Paul’ and ‘Barnabus’ were sent there by the Apostles, who were based in Jerusalem, to investigate the many stories of what God was doing, that were emanating from Antioch.

• The second mention of the term ‘Christian’ appears to have come from the lips of King Agrippa himself who, by the time he had met with St Paul and interviewed him about his deeds and Gospel Preaching, and his subsequent incarceration by his captors, because Paul was deemed a trouble-maker going around preaching about Jesus and how he was raised from the dead, had clearly known about this popularised universal description of ‘Christians’, used synonymously to distinguish followers of Jesus, (see Acts 26:28).

• King Agrippa was the grandson of the late ‘Herod The Great’, (Acts 25:26), and it is said that by AD 53 he became The Tetrarch of Abilene, Galilee, Iturea and Trachontis in Judea around the time of Paul’s conversion to Christ.
In (Acts 25), we read of Paul having been captured by the ‘Judaizers’ (false Jews) not the real Jews of his day, had been delivered to the Romans for judgement and sentencing of death.

However, the Romans did not know what to do with Paul as they felt him to be a victim of injustice and were reluctant to carry out the wishes of Paul’s captors. Paul also delayed mattes because he appealed to Caesar. During his incarceration, Paul gets to meet with King Agrippa who visited Caesarea around the time he was a prisoner there.


(ACTS 26) An example of the problems faced by Paul, in determining the purpose of Christians and what they stand for.

‘Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Thou art permitted to speak for thyself. Then Paul stretched forth the hand, and answered for himself:
I think myself happy, king Agrippa, because I shall answer for myself this day before thee touching all the things whereof I am accused of the Jews: Especially because I know thee to be expert in all customs and questions which are among the Jews: wherefore I beseech thee to hear me patiently...’
‘ ...For the king knoweth of these things, before whom also I speak freely: for I am persuaded that none of these things are hidden from him; for this thing was not done in a corner.
King Agrippa, believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest.
Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.
And Paul said, I would to God, that not only thou, but also all that hear me this day, were both almost, and altogether such as I am, except these bonds...’

• Thirdly, the term ‘Christian’ appears to have actually originated with the Hellenistic Greeks and Pharisees, of whom my studies reveal them to be the actual persecutors of the followers of Jesus, these are ‘The Judaisers’ or False Jews that Paul refers to and they are more commonly known as ‘The Herodians’, referred to in scripture, who continuously harassed the early church stirring up the common people in the hope of endangering the lives of the followers of Jesus Christ, (see 1 Pet. 4:16).

• These’Herodians link back to King Herod and a specific usurper lineage imposed on Isrealites and with connections to Hellenistic Greeks and a hierarchical movement that spawned ‘The Scribes’ and ‘The Pharisees’ movements that developed from this Royal, legal and religious structure that came to dominate Palestine around the time that Jesus was born.


What then is a true definition of the term ‘Christian’ and can there really be ‘False’ Christians?

It is important to note that history is mirrored and the Apostles were very much aware of this in their day, to the extent that they wrote down their concerns, as these occurred. These are the same issues that affect believers and the Church today. There is one exception however, and that is that God has seen fit to warn believers of these issues that will and have, arisen in the Last Days.


So What type Of Christian Are You?
‘A Cultural Christian’ or ‘An Authentic Christian’?

John Woodbridge, a church history professor at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, points out that "just because a person is part of a church doesn't necessarily mean he or she is a follower of Jesus." Woodbridge argues that there's a distinction between "cultural Christians" and "authentic Christians."

This argument can be defined by researching scripture, but to take just one such example, as a possible definition of a ‘Christian’, and one that is retrospectively mentioned by Jesus himself, it can easily be seen that there are two types of ‘Authority’ implied and two types of ‘Churches’ implied and also two types of ’Believers’ implied in Jesus’ statement about the parable of ‘The Ten Virgins’ or ‘The Five Wise Virgins’ versus ‘The Five foolish Virgins’.

Matthew 25: Example of Christian Definition Referred to by Jesus.

1. Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.
2. And five of them were wise, and five were foolish.
3. They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them:
4. But the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.
5. While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept.
6. And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him.
7. Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps.
8. And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out.
9. But the wise answered, saying, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you: but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves.
10. And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.
11. Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us.
12. But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not.
13. Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.

The Lamps appear to refer to the ‘Christian’, who is truly converted and trims his lamp, not only to conserve oil but as an act of true humility, and in a state of continual repentance, and holiness before God and in expectation of his Lord’s impending arrival. One who truly obeys God’s Word in all things. Loves God and Jesus Christ and truly demonstrates love of all the Brethren, irrespective of who they are.

Whereas, the Foolish Virgins were the ones who did not have this same approach to humility, and the need for continual repentance and holiness. They did not truly share the Love of God or Jesus Christ or demonstrate their love for all the Brethren and only sought out the popular sections of the people they met with. You know: the ones with plenty of money and prestige and all the right sayings and conformist behaviours etc etc. They did not see the need to trim their lamps, they were the hedonistic self-righteous Christian who unfortunately mirrored the worship of the Scribes and Pharisee that Jesus often spoke about and warn us about, you know, the ones who always know what the Bible says exactly and what God expects of them, but that their motives for doing these things are selfish and popular, just to be revered by men and make long prayers etc.

Their oil, is of the type that has been purchased through financial gifts just like ‘Simon the sorcerer’ when he offered to pay for to receive the Holy Ghost at the hands of Peter and Paul, during one of their many missions.

This parable that Jesus spoke of when viewed with many other New Testament references is a clear definition of the meaning of the differences that exist between true ‘Authentic’ Christians and that of a ‘Cultural’ Christian’ as defined by Woodbridge and what Jesus contrasts as a definition of a True Christian with that of a False Christian.

(If you wish to read more then follow this link to Suite101: Is Christianity Dangerous?: Has The Christian Church Been Bad or Good? http://protestantism.suite101.com/article.cfm/is-christianity-dangerous#ixzz0q0sAav3O for further debates of this nature. Or visit Religious Tolerance.com. or simply click on the links in the text to see differing aspects of this difficult topic).


What then is a True Christian?


The Bible says: “Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right (or Power), to become children of God.”

According to scripture a Christian is a person who is convicted (or convinced) that he is in all ways sinful. (This conviction is a supernatural (Beyond the capacity of mankind to comprehend without God's help.) work of the Holy Spirit)

According to scripture a Christian is a person who recognizes God’s Holiness and His only provision for our sins in the substitution and death of His Son, Jesus Christ.

According to scripture a Christian is a person, who, once awoken to his spiritual condition, (through the supernatural power of the Holy Spirit) turns away from sin and turns to God, by faith, through his forgiveness and follows Jesus. (Acts 20:21)

According to scripture a Christian is one who having received Jesus as Saviour (from their sins) surrenders everything to Jesus as LORD. Lordship is not optional, but integral to Christian discipleship.

According to scripture a Christian is one who accepts the righteousness of God as his own and does not seek or promote his own self-righteousness above that of God.

According to scripture a Christian is a person who has received the Holy Ghost and has the Living Word in themselves and through Him, is able to seek God and deny the works of the flesh and serve God daily.

However, many people who consider themselves to be Christians do not recognize others as Christians and do not recognise the need to surrender to God daily and are not necessarily in the service of others.

There are said to be about 40 different definitions of the term "Christian" in use today.

Also included in the definition of a ‘Christian’ are those who consider themselves to be Christian even though they do not identify themselves with any particular religious group.

Britain for example: was considered to be a Christian Country.

In my opinion then , a Christian is someone who has truly been touched by God and saved by Grace.

However, I believe that the problems regarding the definition of a Christian has arisen because of the influx of Secularism that has increasingly developed in the church today making believers unaware of the need to isolate themselves from worldliness and the temptations of commercialism and individualism that separates us from the presence of the Living God and each other.

Remember the words of Jesus when he said: “A house divided against itself cannot stand...” Surely this division is the purpose of the ‘Secularist Movement’ within the Church today.

So Believers Beware.

The topics discussed here are not necessarily the complete view of the author

How Wonderful God is.

When we put our trust in God we are rewarded by Him.

When we put our trust in God He shows us how merciful He can be toward us, how loving He is, how gracious and how good He is.


We know how wonderful God is because He communicates with us.

All those who believe in God and put their trust in Him can utter the words of the Psalmist and declare with him how much we: 'Love The lord...' 'because He hears our voice and our supplications'(Psalm 116 v. 1). The reason why believers can say this is because 'The Lord inclines His ear to us...' and this is what gives us the certainty of the knowledge of God's existence and why we can say that: 'We will call upon Him as long as we live'.

King David states that his experience of God's Love for him came at a time when: 'The sorrows of death compassed him, and the pains of hell had got hold upon him: Trouble and Sorrow is all he found!' But then in the midst of his circumstance he says that he: 'Called upon The Lord - to deliver his soul...'.


David tells us of a number of attributes he has discovered about the nature of God.

He shows us in Psalm 116 that God is patient with us, and long suffering toward us.
That God Loves us, because He is willing to listen to us.
That, although God is Gracious and Merciful toward us, that He is also Righteous.
That God is our helper, when life brings us low before Him.
That God deals bountifully with us, and gives us rest.
That God will deliver us from death, and our eyes from shedding tears, and will not let us slip and fall.
That God encourages us to walk before him in the land of the living.
He gives us the cup of His salvation so that we may call upon The Lord, and pay our vows to Him, in the presence of others, who are also witnesses.

This is truly a wonderful Biblical fact and especially so, when we call upon the name of The Lord and offer to him the sacrifice of thanksgiving.

For, like the Psalmist, all believers find that they too share this same knowledge of God's abiding presence. The world cannot understand this relationship that God has with all who those believe in Him. The world is dead to the presence of God and conversely all those who truly believe in God are dead to the world but alive unto God who loves them. I too can say: 'I love The Lord, because He hears my voice'.

Why don't you call upon The Lord today! He says 'call upon me and I will answer'.

If you shall call upon him with all your heart and truly seek Him he will answer you.
Do it now! The Lord is waiting to hear from you.

THE DAY OF THE TARES

Recently, I drove past a church and could not help but notice that on one of its walls was a large white banner, but what really drew my attention though, was the words written on it, which read: "IS GOD DEAD?" Is this really true? Yes___ or No___.

The banner appeared to be like some kind of a poll and suggested that people who read it should consider the statement and vote accordingly.

However, my immediate thought was this, what was the church doing posing this kind of arguement in the first place. Surely this kind of thinking, and questioning, goes against the grain of what a church is supposed to believe in, and stand for.

Secondly: this type of issue appears to be a clear denial of faith, because if the church in question is truly filled with believers in Jesus Christ then there is no way that this question of whether, or not, God is dead, would ever pass the lips of a true believer.

A true believer knows unquestionably that God is 'Alive' and that Jesus is their Saviour. This banner is in my view, a clear indicator that the "end of the Gentiles is drawing near" and that the "tares" have risen up among the "wheat" and are starting to choke the Life of The Gospel out of the Churches.

It is a situation reminiscent of that old idiom: "If you can't beat them - join Them" and as happens in other places in history "just bleed them dry".

How have the tares come to be so powerful in the church?

Well The Church is like a garden and as all gardeners know, plants do well when properly tended, fed and watered. The tares (weeds) are rooted out and the plants grow strong and healthy.

Jesus says to his pastors "Feed my Sheep" but what happens to the sheep when the Pastors do not feed them, but continuosly neglect them and in many cases even feed them the wrong kind of food. The sheep become aneamic and get all manner of sicknesses, and they become malnourished and starved and die. Satan knows this only too well.

Secularism is on the rise in Britain's Churches and political correctness is at the forefront of its agenda as it seeks to undermine true faith and Godliness in the church today.

The Bible warns believers that there is a day coming in the which, will be a famine..., not a famine of bread and water, but a famine of hearing "the Word" Of God...". That day is now! It is a day when men will run to and fro throughout the Earth, a day in which knowlege is increased... A day in which they shall search for the 'Word of God' and shall not find it.

To the true believer I have this one thing to say: Hold fast to the faith that is in Christ Jesus.

2012: Mayan Mayhem Predicted.

There appears to be a growing number of so-called 'experts' that are making some serious predictions about the end of the world. Are they right in their assumptions? Many are adamant that the world will end in 2012. Is this date a true and accurate account of the facts, or are these assumptions based on wild and speculative misconceptions of the data they claim to have found?

Take Nostradamus or Sir Isaac Newton's Bible Code Prphecy as examples: they have both approached the subject of the 'End of the World' from different perspectives - Scrying and Chronology - but have apparently come up with similar results for their predictions and it is also claimed that they have predicted 2012 as a possible date for an apocalyptic end for mankind. Yet when ordinary people attempt to discover their calculations and see how they worked it out there appears to be restrictions on access to their mathematical formulas and manuscripts, which can only be accessed by the elite of society.

Mayan calenders and Egyptian hieroglyphics are also said to famously stop at this date leading many to believe that the end of the world is imminent. So is this prediction more than a Hollywood blockbuster?

The Bible does not give any open clues about the date for the apocalypse and there are those who suggest that certain predictions for the last days are encoded in the scriptures and therefore linked to a chronological system that is at best, difficult to interpret, let alone understand.

My personal view is that the end of the world is not yet but that does not mean that we are not in an apocalyptic phase as the world has currently experienced a number of events which have been foretold by Jesus himself such as wars and rumours of wars, famines, earthquakes and other natural disasters.

Jesus said: "Be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet... All these things are the beginning of sorrows" (Matthew ch24 v. 6-8).

Thus it would appear that the so-called experts are wrong. It seems that Jesus is saying that these signs are not the end of the world but the beginning of sorrows, a time of great tribulation and upheaval for all believers.

I believe that the great conjunction (AKA the great alignment) of the planets is simply God's way of bringing all mankind into perfect alignment with his word to get man to take notice of the things that He says will come to pass if there is no repentance. Some of you folks out there may agree with the 2012 prediction and for those of you who consider this date a fact, I have only this to say: Only time will tell!